Introduction
GitHub MCP is changing the way teams interact with repositories compared to traditional API calls. Understanding the differences helps CTOs and PMs redesign development pipelines for efficiency.
What is GitHub MCP?
GitHub MCP (Model Context Protocol) is a session-based API layer that preserves context between calls. Instead of sending repeated metadata with each request like REST, MCP maintains state across commands.
For more details, visit Official MCP Servers.
MCP’s Context-Aware Design
- Shared Session State: MCP keeps a session alive, allowing subsequent commands to access prior context without restating data.
- Metadata Persistence: Project and user-level metadata stays in memory for the duration of the session, removing redundant payloads.
Traditional API Calls Overview
REST API calls in GitHub are stateless—each call is independent, requiring all required parameters and metadata for every request.
Pros and Cons of REST
Pros:
- Well-known architecture
- Mature tooling and standards
- Broad ecosystem support
Cons:
- No built-in context retention
- Repetitive data passing increases overhead
GitHub MCP vs REST API GitHub
| Feature | MCP | REST |
|---|---|---|
| Context Sharing | Built-in | Manual |
| State Management | Persistent per session | None |
| Typical Payload Size | Smaller | Larger |
| Efficiency Over Time | Higher | Lower |
Efficiency Gains
With MCP, development teams eliminate repeated payload construction. Pipelines become leaner because state is shared over ongoing interactions.
Pipeline Changes for CTOs/PMs
- Transition from designing each API call as self-contained
- Adopt sessions that orchestrate multiple commands coherently
- Align architecture with collaborative workflows, reducing cognitive load on developers
Implementation Considerations
Server Setup:
- Install and configure MCP Server per GitHub workspace
Compatibility:
- Evaluate legacy REST-based systems for integration points
Skills and Tooling:
- Training developers on session-oriented programming
- Updating API clients to be MCP-aware
Choosing Between MCP and REST
When MCP Offers ROI:
- Complex, multi-step workflows requiring shared state
- High-frequency operations across large repositories
When REST Remains Optimal:
- Simple, infrequent operations
- Interoperability with services that expect stateless APIs
Conclusion
GitHub MCP reduces repetition and improves coordination by standardizing context sharing. REST maintains broader flexibility and compatibility but at the cost of handling state manually.