Back to datasets
Dataset assetOpen Source CommunityImage AnalysisHistology Images

CIMA histology images

This dataset provides user‑generated landmark annotations for CIMA histology images, containing 2D tissue micro‑sections stained with different methods. Challenges include extremely large image sizes, visual heterogeneity, and lack of salient objects. The dataset includes 108 image portions with manually placed landmarks for registration quality assessment.

Source
github
Created
Apr 24, 2018
Updated
Jan 19, 2024
Signals
114 views
Availability
Linked source ready
Overview

Dataset description and usage context

Dataset Overview

Dataset Name

Dataset: histology landmarks

Dataset Content

The dataset contains 2D tissue micro‑section images stained by various methods. It is mainly used to assess registration quality and includes 108 images with manually placed landmarks.

Image Characteristics

  • Image Size: Extremely large
  • Visual Heterogeneity: Significant
  • Lack of Salient Objects: Yes

Landmark Information

  • Structure: Follows ImageJ standard structure and coordinate framework
  • Origin: Upper‑left corner of the image plane [0, 0]
  • Tools: Simple macros are provided for importing and exporting landmarks
  • File Layout: Each image has a corresponding .csv file stored in the same directory

Dataset Structure

DATASET |- [set_name1] | |- scale-[number1]pc | | |- [image_name1].jpg | | |- [image_name1].csv | | |- [image_name2].jpg | | |- [image_name2].csv | | | ... | | |- [image_name].jpg | | - [image_name].csv | |- scale-[number2]pc | | ... | - scale-[number]pc | |- [image_name1].png | |- [image_name1].csv | | ... | |- [image_name].png | - [image_name].csv |- [set_name2] | ...

  • [set_name]

Landmark Generation and Visualization

  • Generation: Use python handlers/run_generate_landmarks.py script
  • Visualization: Use python handlers/run_visualise_landmarks.py script

Annotation Details

  • Initial Annotations: Aggregated landmark sets placed by multiple users
  • Additional Annotations: Aimed at improving precision by comparing landmarks across differently stained images

Annotation Structure

ANNOTATIONS |- [set_name1] | |- user-[initials1]_scale-[number2]pc | | |- [image_name1].csv | | |- [image_name2].csv | | | ... | | - [image_name].csv | |- user-[initials2]_scale-[number1]pc | | ... | |- user-[initials]_scale-[number]pc | | |- [image_name2].csv | | | ... | | - [image_name].csv |- [set_name2] | ...

  • [set_name]

Validation Process

  • Visual Check: Preliminary validation by comparing deformation of landmark pairs
  • Error Analysis: Compute inter‑landmark error; pairs exceeding a threshold are flagged as suspicious

References

J. Borovec, A. Muñoz‑Barrutia, and J. Kybic, “Benchmarking of image registration methods for differently stained histological slides” in 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), p. 3368‑3372, 2018. DOI: 10.1109/ICIP.2018.8451040

Need downstream help?

Pair the dataset with AI analysis and content workflows.

Once the source passes your review, move straight into summarization, transformation, report drafting, or presentation generation with the JuheAI toolchain.

Explore AI studio